How do Firstview and Humanly compare on screening, interviews, assessments and hiring workflows? This comparison looks at where they overlap, where they differ, and which needs each is built to serve.
Written by Ece Badak · Fact-checked by Barkin Kutucu
Updated · 19 primary sources reviewed
Published by Firstview. Based on the sources and scope described below.
From job post to final decision, with evidence
Fast screening and scheduling for high-volume hiring
Both platforms run AI interviews by voice and take notes in your team's interviews. The difference is the focus: Firstview scores every CV against weighted criteria and links each verdict to the candidate's words, while Humanly moves high-volume applicants to a booked interview fast.
You want each verdict tied to what the candidate said, not only a fast path to an interview slot. Firstview scores every CV against weights you set, interviews candidates live in 42 languages, and backs each verdict with the candidate's own words. It works with or without an ATS.
Your team hires hourly and frontline staff at volume and wants every applicant answered by SMS or chat, screened with knockout questions, interviewed by chat, voice or video and booked in, in Humanly's own ATS or yours.
These 16 rows compare hiring tasks, not whole platforms. A Full rating means the vendor offers the feature, not that every plan includes it; the pricing section shows what each plan covers.
| Capability | Firstview | Humanly |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Recruiter-facing weighted CV scoring | ||
| AI splitting of combined-PDF CV uploads | ||
| Contextual CV evaluation beyond keyword matching | ||
| JD-based criteria / rubric generation | ||
| Interview | ||
| Real-time conversational AI interview | ||
| Adaptive follow-up questions | ||
| AI interview designer / custom questions | ||
| Assess | ||
| Technical / coding evaluation | ||
| Soft-skill / competency evaluation | ||
| Decide | ||
| Criterion-level evidence & score rationale | ||
| Structured candidate report | ||
| Human interview co-pilot / note-taker | ||
| Operate | ||
| Native customizable hiring pipeline without a separate ATS | ||
| Calendar integration / scheduling | ||
| Candidate communication automation | ||
| Hiring analytics dashboard |
Full and Partial describe what each vendor's cited public sources show; every source carries its audit date in the source list. Not published means the reviewed sources did not establish the capability; it does not mean the capability is absent.
The scorecard is the index. These five sections explain what the differences mean in a hiring workflow.
Firstview scores every CV against the weights you set
Firstview scores every CV against weighted criteria you set, checks dealbreakers first, and shows the evidence behind each score. It suggests criteria from your job description, and a combined PDF of CVs splits into individual candidates automatically.
The Humanly ATS gives applicants Red-Yellow-Green scores, and its Talent CRM ranks candidates with AI matching. Its public sources do not show how a CV is read against the role, weights you set or the splitting of a combined PDF.
Humanly's color score sorts applicants for a fast first look. Firstview gives each criterion a reason and a weight you set, and the same criteria carry into the interview.
Firstview interviews each candidate live, in their own language, with follow-up questions
Tell me about a project that changed direction.
Customer feedback challenged our initial plan, so we reworked the approach.
How did you decide which feedback to act on?
Firstview runs live, two-way voice interviews in the browser, in 42 languages. It asks follow-up questions based on each answer, answers the candidate's own questions about the role, and suggests role-specific questions your team can edit.
Humanly's AI Interviewer runs structured interviews by chat, voice or video around the clock, set up in its Interview Builder with your questions, depth, tone and persona. In a first-party demo it asks candidates to elaborate on short answers.
Both hold a real conversation, so judge it on your own role: in a demo, Firstview interviews for one of your own open roles.
Firstview gives technical roles an in-depth interview and a technical report
Firstview evaluates competencies and role-specific knowledge inside the interview itself, using 30+ competency frameworks. Technical roles get an in-depth conversational interview and a detailed technical report instead of a coding test.
Humanly's AI Interviewer screens for role fit and competencies and scores traits such as communication, empathy and teamwork. Its public sources do not show technical evaluation or coding exercises.
Both assess skills in the conversation rather than in separate tests. For technical roles, Firstview adds an in-depth technical interview and a detailed technical report.
Firstview links every verdict to the moment the candidate answered
“I brought the two teams together to agree on the priorities.”Example candidate answer
Aligned teams around shared priorities
Each Firstview verdict links to the candidate's answer and the moment they gave it, and unclear cases go to a person, never to an automatic rejection. Firstview Notetaker also joins your team's own interviews on Zoom, Google Meet and Teams and files the notes on the candidate, so AI and human interviews end up on one record.
Humanly's AI Interviewer returns a scorecard with competency scores, a summary and a recommendation, shown with the transcript and a short rationale. Its AI Notetaker joins Zoom, Google Meet and Teams interviews. Its public sources do not show evidence linked to each criterion.
Your team can check any verdict against what the candidate said, and the same criteria run from the CV through the AI interview to your team's interview notes. Both take notes in your team's interviews.
Firstview keeps one set of criteria from screening to decision
Firstview includes the pipeline board, calendar scheduling, email and WhatsApp messages, and hiring analytics, so a team can run hiring without a separate ATS. One set of role criteria runs from sourcing to the final decision.
The Humanly ATS handles jobs, applicants and workflows with click-to-apply job board publishing. Candidates book interviews by chat, SMS, email or voice with reminders, and its dashboard tracks drop-off and time to hire by location.
Both can run hiring without a separate ATS. If speed from application to a booked interview across many locations is the priority, Humanly is built for that. If screening, interviews and the decision should follow the same criteria, Firstview keeps them together.
Firstview builds its rules into how it evaluates: it never analyzes faces, video is never part of the evaluation, and a person makes every hiring decision. Humanly says it builds on Microsoft's Responsible AI Framework and hides candidate identity in early scoring.
Neither vendor publishes a price list. Firstview sells subscription plans and starts with a pilot on one of your own open roles. Humanly quotes after a demo and names platform-based, per-qualified-candidate and per-hire pricing.
Decide by how your team wants to run hiring.
Yes. Firstview covers hiring from the job post to the final decision: CV scoring against weights you set, live AI interviews, a notetaker for your team's interviews and its own pipeline. Humanly adds round-the-clock SMS and chat engagement, knockout screening and self-scheduling built for hourly, high-volume hiring.
Yes. Humanly's AI Interviewer runs structured interviews by chat, voice or video around the clock. Firstview interviews each candidate live and by voice, in 42 languages, follows up when an answer falls short and links every verdict to the candidate's words.
Firstview scores every CV against criteria and weights you set, with a reason for each criterion, and carries the same criteria into the interview. The Humanly ATS gives applicants a Red-Yellow-Green score, and its public sources do not show how a CV is read against the role.
No. Humanly offers its own ATS for high-volume hiring and also works with your existing ATS. Firstview includes its own pipeline, calendar scheduling, email and WhatsApp messages and hiring analytics.
Both. Humanly's AI Notetaker joins Zoom, Google Meet and Teams and syncs a structured summary to the ATS. Firstview Notetaker joins the same platforms, fills your notes or scorecard template and files it on the same record as the AI interview.
Neither vendor publishes a price list. Firstview sells subscription plans and starts with a pilot on one of your own open roles. Humanly quotes after a demo and names platform-based, per-qualified-candidate and per-hire pricing.
No. Firstview never analyzes faces, and video is never part of the evaluation. Integrity rules apply while the interview runs: the whole screen is shared, the camera stays on and virtual cameras are blocked.
Product designer
Go beyond the CV.
Alex Morgan · Product designer
CV scores, interview insights and team feedback.
Teams we've worked with
firstviewSee how Firstview connects screening, interviews and hiring decisions for your team.
